Change Data Capture (CDC) • Trigger-based CDC PatternsHard⏱️ ~3 min
Failure Modes and Edge Cases
Trigger Path Blocking:
The most dangerous failure mode is that problems in trigger execution directly impact your core transactional workload. Triggers run synchronously within transactions. If a trigger becomes slow or blocks, every write to that table slows or blocks.
Consider a production incident: a poorly chosen index on the change table causes inserts to suddenly take 50 milliseconds instead of 2 milliseconds. Write latency p99 spikes from 30 milliseconds to 200 milliseconds. User facing requests start timing out. Upstream services experience cascading failures. The operational database is no longer just a data store; it is also running CDC infrastructure that can bring down the entire write path.
Many teams temporarily disable CDC or adjust triggers for bulk operations, accepting temporary inconsistency. This requires careful coordination and verification that downstream systems can tolerate staleness during the maintenance window.
Backpressure and Storage:
If downstream systems or the CDC reader fail, change tables accumulate unbounded rows. At 5000 writes per second, even a 30 minute outage produces 9 million rows. Without storage limits or alerts, you can exhaust disk space, causing write failures on the primary database.
Production systems set aggressive retention policies (7 to 14 days) and monitor change table size and reader lag continuously. Alerting on lag over 5 minutes or change table size over 10 gigabytes gives operations time to intervene before critical failures.
Multi Table Transaction Boundaries:
Preserving transactional consistency across tables requires careful handling. If a business transaction updates orders and inventory tables, both triggers write rows with the same
❗ Remember: Unlike asynchronous replication or separate ETL (Extract Transform Load) jobs, trigger failures happen inline with user transactions. A single slow trigger can degrade application response times immediately.
Schema Drift and Missing Triggers:
Operational teams deploy schema changes. A developer adds a new table without corresponding triggers. Changes to that table never get captured. In regulated environments, missing audit records can cause compliance violations.
Detection requires active monitoring. Periodic reconciliation comparing row counts or checksums between source tables and downstream systems catches drift. One pattern is a nightly job that checks COUNT(*) on source versus COUNT(DISTINCT primary_key) in change tables for each monitored table.
Schema evolution creates similar problems. Adding a column to the source without updating the trigger and change table schema means downstream consumers never see that field. Dropping a column that triggers reference causes write failures. Robust continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes with automated schema migration testing are essential.
Bulk Operation Overload:
A one time data migration updates 100 million rows. This generates 100 million change records. At 10000 events per second processing rate, downstream systems face 2.7 hours of catch up. The change table can experience lock contention on hot pages as millions of inserts compete.
Bulk Update Impact Timeline
NORMAL
500 lag
→
BULK UPDATE
100M lag
→
RECOVERY
2.7 hours
transaction_id. But if the CDC reader processes these tables independently, downstream systems might see partial state (order created but inventory not decremented).
Solutions include transaction aware batching where the CDC reader groups changes by transaction_id and commit_timestamp, or idempotent downstream consumers that handle out of order delivery gracefully using sequence numbers.💡 Key Takeaways
✓Trigger execution problems (slow queries, lock contention) directly impact write latency and can cause cascading failures in user facing transactions
✓Bulk operations like 100 million row updates generate equal change records, causing multi hour replication lag (2.7 hours at 10k events per second throughput)
✓Schema changes without corresponding trigger updates lead to missing change capture or write failures, requiring reconciliation jobs and CI/CD integration
✓Change table storage grows at 86 GB per day at 5000 writes per second, requiring aggressive retention policies and storage monitoring with alerts
✓Multi table transaction boundaries require CDC readers to group changes by transaction ID and commit timestamp or rely on idempotent downstream consumers
📌 Examples
1Production incident: a missing index on change table causes trigger insert latency to spike from 2 ms to 50 ms. Application write p99 jumps from 30 ms to 200 ms, causing timeout errors. Team adds index under load, latency returns to normal within 5 minutes
2Bulk migration updates 100 million user records. CDC reader processes at 10000 events per second. Downstream data warehouse lags 2.7 hours behind. Team disables triggers during bulk operation, runs one time reconciliation job afterward to catch missed changes