Definition
A data catalog system is a centralized metadata repository that helps engineers and analysts discover, understand, and trust data across their organization by tracking what data exists, where it lives, how it's produced, and who uses it.
The Core Problem:
As companies grow beyond a few data stores, a specific problem emerges. You have dozens of databases, hundreds of data pipelines, thousands of tables, and maybe tens of thousands of analysts and engineers. When someone needs customer email data or monthly revenue metrics, they face three questions that become impossible to answer through tribal knowledge or spreadsheets.
First, what data actually exists? Searching through wikis or asking on Slack doesn't scale past 50 tables. Second, can you trust it? That "users" table might be deprecated or have known quality issues. Third, what breaks if you change this dataset? Drop a column and you might accidentally break 15 downstream dashboards.
What a Catalog Actually Stores:
A data catalog stores metadata, not the data itself. Think of it as a card catalog in a library: it tells you about the books but doesn't contain the actual content.
For each data asset (tables, views, streams, dashboards, machine learning features), the catalog tracks schema information like column names and types, ownership details showing who's responsible, lineage relationships showing which jobs produce this data and what consumes it, usage statistics like query counts and user access patterns, data quality signals such as freshness and completeness, and access policies defining who can view or modify the asset.
Where It Fits:
The catalog sits alongside your data platform components (warehouses, lakes, streaming systems), not in front of them. When someone runs a query, it goes directly to the warehouse. The catalog doesn't intercept queries or move data. Instead, it listens to events from these systems, builds a unified view of all metadata, and exposes it through search APIs and a user interface.
This architecture means the catalog can be eventually consistent. If a table gets updated, the catalog might learn about it 30 to 120 seconds later. That's acceptable because discovery and documentation don't need real time precision. The trade off is simple: you get automated, always on metadata coverage across every system without adding latency to actual data queries.
✓Solves discovery, trust, and impact analysis problems that emerge when you have hundreds of data stores and thousands of tables
✓Stores metadata only (schema, lineage, ownership, quality) not actual data, acting as a search and knowledge layer on top of your data platform
✓Integrates with all systems through event ingestion and periodic crawling, typically becoming consistent within 30 to 120 seconds
✓Does not sit on the query path so it can be eventually consistent without impacting data processing performance
✓At large companies may cover tens of thousands of tables, petabytes of data, and thousands of daily users with 99.9 percent availability
1When an analyst searches for "monthly active users", the catalog returns ranked results showing which tables are blessed for that metric, who owns them, last update time, and downstream dashboards in under 300 ms
2When an engineer wants to deprecate a legacy table, the catalog queries its lineage graph to show all downstream jobs and dashboards that would break, preventing accidental outages
3A data pipeline writes a new table to the warehouse at 2:00 PM. The warehouse emits a metadata event. By 2:02 PM the catalog has discovered it, inferred schema, tagged the owner, and made it searchable