Availability vs Reliability: The Critical Distinction

The Core Difference:

Availability measures uptime: what fraction of time is your service responding? It's calculated as uptime divided by total time, typically expressed in "nines." A system with 99.9% availability is down for roughly 43.2 minutes per month.

Reliability measures correctness: does your system produce the right output without failures over time? It's characterized by Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). The relationship is Availability ≈ MTBF / (MTBF + MTTR).

Why This Matters:

Two systems can have identical availability percentages but vastly different user experiences. Consider System A that fails every hour but recovers in 1 second versus System B that fails once per month but takes 43 minutes to recover. Both achieve 99.9% availability, but System A is unreliable (constant interruptions) while System B is highly reliable (rare failures).

The inverse also happens: your service might be "up" and responding to every request (high availability) but returning stale or incorrect data (low reliability). A cache layer that serves outdated prices after a database update is available but unreliable for that moment.

⚠️ Common Pitfall: Tracking only HTTP 200 response rates without validating correctness. Your dashboard shows 99.99% success, but users are receiving corrupted shopping carts or wrong balances.
In Production:

Cloud storage services illustrate this perfectly. A major cloud provider designs object storage for 99.999999999% durability (11 nines) of your data through aggressive replication across failure domains. But the API to access that data offers only 99.99% availability. They protect your bits (reliability of storage) at far higher levels than they guarantee you can reach them at any instant (availability of access).

The Trade-off:

Pursuing both simultaneously gets expensive. Strong consistency mechanisms that improve reliability (ensuring correct data) often hurt availability during network partitions. You choose based on what your users care about: financial transactions demand reliability first, social media feeds tolerate brief unavailability or stale data.

💡 Key Takeaways

•Availability is uptime divided by total time. 99.9% allows 43.2 minutes downtime monthly, 99.99% allows 4.32 minutes, 99.999% allows only 26 seconds.

•Reliability is probability of correct operation without failure, measured by MTBF (time between failures) and MTTR (time to repair). Formula: Availability ≈ MTBF / (MTBF + MTTR).

•Different failure patterns yield same availability percentage. Frequent brief outages (low MTBF, low MTTR) versus rare long outages (high MTBF, high MTTR) both can hit 99.9%.

•A service can be available but unreliable by returning incorrect or stale data, or reliable but unavailable due to network partitions cutting off access.

•Each additional "nine" of availability costs disproportionately more in redundancy, testing, and operational complexity. Choose targets based on actual business impact, not arbitrary goals.

📌 Examples

Cache server responds instantly to every request (100% available) but serves prices from 10 minutes ago after database update (unreliable for real time pricing).

Database fails once per quarter but takes 2 hours to restore from backup (high reliability, but when it fails, availability drops significantly during that window).

Payment processing system with 99.99% availability: can be down maximum 4.32 minutes per month. One 5 minute outage during peak shopping exceeds entire monthly error budget.

← Back to Availability & Reliability Overview