Learn→Distributed Data Processing→Resource Management (YARN, Kubernetes)→1 of 5

Distributed Data Processing • Resource Management (YARN, Kubernetes)Easy⏱️ ~3 min

What is Resource Management in Data Engineering?

Definition
Resource Management in data engineering is the system that decides which data processing jobs run where and when across a shared cluster of computers, ensuring fair allocation of Compute Processing Units (CPUs), memory, disk, and network capacity among multiple users and applications.
The Core Problem: Imagine you have a cluster with 2,000 servers, each with 32 CPU cores and 256 GB of RAM. That's 64,000 cores and 512 TB of memory available. You need to run hundreds of jobs simultaneously: nightly batch Extract Transform Load (ETL) pipelines, continuous streaming applications, and machine learning training jobs. Without a resource manager, you'd face chaos.

If everyone manually picked servers, you'd get collisions where multiple jobs fight for the same machine, causing slowdowns and crashes. If you statically assigned servers to teams, you'd waste capacity: the data science team's servers sit idle at night while the ETL team's servers are overloaded.

How Resource Managers Solve This: A resource management system sits between your jobs and the physical servers. When you submit a Spark job that needs 100 executors with 4 cores and 16 GB each, the resource manager finds available capacity across the cluster, allocates containers or pods on specific nodes, and tracks their resource usage. It enforces quotas so no single user monopolizes the cluster, handles failures by restarting containers on healthy nodes, and continuously optimizes placement to maximize utilization.

Target Cluster Efficiency
60-80%
CPU UTILIZATION
10-30 min
ETL JOB LATENCY
Two Main Approaches: YARN (Yet Another Resource Negotiator) and Kubernetes represent two different philosophies. YARN emerged from the Hadoop ecosystem, designed specifically for big data batch workloads like MapReduce and Hive. Kubernetes grew from Google's internal systems, providing general purpose container orchestration for any workload: microservices, batch jobs, and streaming applications.

Both provide the same fundamental capabilities: abstracting physical servers into schedulable units, isolating CPU and memory between jobs, and implementing policies that decide which jobs get resources first. The choice between them depends on your workload mix, whether you prioritize data locality with Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), and how important elastic cloud scaling is to your architecture.

💡 Key Takeaways

✓Resource management solves the cluster scheduling problem: deciding which jobs run on which servers, preventing conflicts and maximizing hardware utilization across shared infrastructure

✓YARN focuses on Hadoop big data workloads with built in understanding of data locality for HDFS, while Kubernetes provides general purpose container orchestration for any workload type

✓Typical production targets are 60 to 80 percent CPU utilization with job latencies ranging from 10 to 30 minutes for large ETL pipelines

✓Resource managers enforce multi tenancy through quotas and priorities, ensuring no single team or application monopolizes cluster resources

✓The system continuously tracks resource usage, handles node failures by rescheduling containers, and optimizes placement to pack workloads efficiently

📌 Examples

1A 2,000 node cluster with 32 cores and 256 GB per node provides 64,000 vcores and 512 TB RAM total capacity for scheduling

2When submitting a Spark job needing 100 executors at 4 cores and 16 GB each, the resource manager finds nodes with available capacity and launches containers with those exact resource limits

3Queue based isolation: allocate 40 percent capacity for core ETL jobs, 30 percent for data science workloads, and remaining capacity for ad hoc queries

← Back to Resource Management (YARN, Kubernetes) Overview