Trade Offs: Canary vs Blue Green vs Shadow Deployment
CANARY DEPLOYMENT
Canary gradually increases traffic from 1% to 100% over 24-48 hours, monitoring system and product metrics at each step. Pros: Catches problems early with minimal blast radius, validates product impact with real users. Cons: Slow (days not minutes), requires 5-10% extra capacity during parallel operation, complex metric infrastructure.
BLUE-GREEN DEPLOYMENT
Blue-green runs two identical environments. Deploy to green (inactive), validate with synthetic tests, then atomically switch the load balancer. Pros: Fast cutover (seconds), instant rollback, simple mental model. Cons: Requires 2x capacity, validates only system health (synthetic tests cannot measure user behavior), all users hit the new version simultaneously.
SHADOW DEPLOYMENT
Shadow duplicates production traffic to the new version without affecting user responses. Pros: Zero user impact, validates latency and resource usage under real load, useful for cache warming. Cons: Cannot measure user behavior (users do not see shadow responses), doubles request volume (cost), only validates system metrics.
WHEN TO USE EACH
Use canary: ML models, ranking changes, anything where user behavior matters. Use blue-green: Schema migrations, infrastructure changes, emergency rollbacks. Use shadow: New services before canary, cache warming, validating feature pipelines under load.