Computer Vision Systems • Real-time Video ProcessingMedium⏱️ ~2 min
Edge vs Cloud Inference Trade-offs for Video ML
The edge versus cloud decision fundamentally shapes latency, cost, and operational complexity for video ML systems. Edge inference runs models on device or near camera, eliminating backhaul network latency and bandwidth costs. A typical edge deployment processes 1080p30 with 20 to 50 milliseconds inference time on a mobile Neural Processing Unit (NPU) or embedded GPU, avoiding the 50 to 150 milliseconds round trip time (RTT) to cloud. This enables sub 100 millisecond total latency for safety critical applications like autonomous vehicle perception or industrial robot control.
The trade off is device cost and operational complexity. An edge device with sufficient compute for real time inference costs 200 to 800 dollars per unit compared to 50 to 100 dollars for a basic camera. Model updates require over the air deployment to thousands of heterogeneous devices rather than centralized cloud rollout. Monitoring and debugging across distributed edge fleet is significantly harder than centralized logging and tracing in cloud infrastructure.
Cloud inference centralizes management and enables elastic scaling. A single Kubernetes cluster with autoscaling GPU nodes can process variable load from thousands of cameras, scaling from 10 to 200 GPUs based on demand within minutes. Cloud deployment enables rapid A/B testing where 5% of traffic routes to candidate models for validation before full rollout. However, each frame requires network transmission, adding 50 to 200 milliseconds depending on distance and congestion, plus 0.50 to 2 dollars per TB of egress bandwidth.
Production systems often hybrid: run lightweight detection on edge for real time feedback and upload filtered frames or crops to cloud for heavyweight verification. For example, edge runs a 10 millisecond mobilenet detector at 15 FPS, uploads only frames with detections, and cloud runs a 100 millisecond ResNet classifier on uploaded crops. This reduces bandwidth by 80% while maintaining high precision through two stage verification.
💡 Key Takeaways
•Edge inference delivers 20 to 50ms on device latency avoiding 50 to 150ms cloud RTT, critical for sub 100ms total latency in safety applications
•Edge device with ML acceleration costs 200 to 800 dollars versus 50 to 100 dollars for basic camera, multiplied across thousands of deployments
•Cloud enables elastic scaling from 10 to 200 GPUs within minutes and rapid A/B testing on 5% traffic, but adds 50 to 200ms network latency per frame
•Network egress costs 0.50 to 2 dollars per TB, making continuous 1080p30 upload from thousands of cameras economically prohibitive
•Hybrid approach runs 10ms edge detector at 15 FPS, uploads only detection crops for 100ms cloud verification, reducing bandwidth by 80% while maintaining precision
•Over the air model updates and distributed debugging across heterogeneous edge fleet significantly increases operational complexity versus centralized cloud rollout
📌 Examples
Autonomous vehicle perception runs 30ms object detection and tracking on vehicle GPU to meet control loop deadlines, uploads only interesting scenes to cloud for map building and model improvement
Retail analytics deploys 5ms person detector on edge camera, uploads crops only when customers enter high value zones, runs 50ms pose estimation and action recognition in cloud for detailed behavior analysis