Idempotency and Atomic Publication Patterns
Why Idempotency Matters
Idempotency guarantees that rerunning a backfill job produces identical results without duplicates or inconsistencies. This is critical because large backfills fail mid run due to transient errors, stragglers, or resource limits, and must be restartable without corrupting previously written partitions.
Deterministic Upserts
The foundation is deterministic upserts keyed by entity ID, feature name, and timestamp. Instead of appending rows, each write overwrites any existing row with the same key. Running the job twice produces identical output. Delta Lake and Hudi provide MERGE operations that implement this pattern efficiently.
Partition Level Atomicity
Write backfill output to staging partitions, validate completeness and correctness, then atomically swap staging into production. This prevents partial writes from being visible to downstream consumers. If validation fails, discard staging and retry without affecting production tables.
Checkpointing Strategy
For multi hour backfills, checkpoint progress at partition boundaries. If a job fails after completing partitions 1 through 50, the restart should skip those partitions and resume from partition 51. Store checkpoint state in a durable metadata store separate from the output tables.
Conflict Resolution
When multiple backfill jobs write to overlapping partitions (rare but possible during migrations), define deterministic conflict resolution: latest writer wins, highest version wins, or fail loudly. Ambiguous merge semantics cause silent data corruption that surfaces months later as unexplained model degradation.
Audit Trail
Log backfill job metadata: start time, end time, input data ranges, output partition counts, row counts, and checksums. This audit trail enables debugging when downstream consumers report data quality issues.