ML Infrastructure & MLOpsAutomated Rollback & Canary AnalysisMedium⏱️ ~3 min

Canary Analysis vs Blue Green vs Rolling Updates

Comparison
Canary trades rollout speed for safety and data-driven confidence. Blue-green offers instant rollback but full exposure. Rolling updates are simple but blend metrics. Shadow mode provides risk-free validation.

BLUE-GREEN

Swap all traffic in seconds between two full environments (blue=current, green=new). If green is broken, 100% of users see failures until flip back. Requires 2× capacity during cutover. Fast rollback but all-or-nothing blast radius.

ROLLING UPDATES

Gradually replace instances one or few at a time until fleet is updated. Rollback requires another rolling cycle in reverse (tens of minutes). No extra capacity cost. Simple orchestration. Downside: metrics blend old and new versions throughout rollout, making detection slow.

SHADOW MODE

Mirror traffic to canary for measurement, primary responses still go to users—zero user impact. Powerful for ML: compare prediction distributions and latency under live load before real exposure. Cannot catch issues from real user state changes or high write rates. Adds compute overhead (doubles read traffic).

💡 Decision Guide: Blue-green for instant rollback or schema changes. Rolling for simplicity with strong pre-prod testing. Shadow for initial ML validation. Canary when offline metrics do not predict production behavior well.

CANARY TRADE-OFFS

Canary exposes 5-10% initially (limited blast radius), takes 15-30 min to ramp to 50%, needs only 1.1-1.2× capacity. Rollback is immediate. Requires routing complexity, observability pipelines, and enough traffic volume for statistical validity.

💡 Key Takeaways
Blue green flips 100 percent of traffic instantly with 2 times capacity cost, canary ramps over 15 to 30 minutes with 1.1 to 1.2 times capacity but limits blast radius to 5 to 10 percent initially
Rolling updates have zero capacity overhead and simple orchestration but slow rollback (requires reverse rolling cycle), canary rollback is immediate
Shadow traffic provides zero user impact validation for ML models (compare predictions and latency under load) but cannot catch write side effects or state dependent issues, adds compute overhead
Canary is ideal for ML when offline metrics do not predict production behavior and you need to measure real user CTR, conversion, or prediction quality under actual traffic
Choose blue green for instant cutover needs or incompatible schema changes, rolling for simplicity with strong testing, shadow then canary for ML model validation
📌 Interview Tips
1Uber uses shadow mode for new ML models to validate inference latency and prediction distributions under live load, then switches to 5 percent canary to measure real trip acceptance rates before full rollout
2Google runs shadow traffic for search ranking changes to compare result quality and latency, catching issues with zero user impact before exposing even 1 percent of production traffic
← Back to Automated Rollback & Canary Analysis Overview